The decent ones are metal, very heavy and built like tanks!! Thanks for clarifying. As you say, the later verson was pretty dreadful, but its plastic build gives it away. The old S1s were good, more modern ones (both AF and manual) were not so good - some truly awful, but when I said the 2.8-4 was the best of the 70-210s I was referring only to the old ones. Chromatic aberration is much worse than my Sigma 70-300 APO DG, expected and accepted. Unfortunately soft at 2.8 and at the end of the focal length, if stepped down, very sharp but still quite usable at 2.8. Same build from what I'm told as the Sigma. 1) Genuine Konica Minolta maxxum 70-210mm AF F3.5-4.5 Lens w/ LARGE Sun/Flower Shade- 55mm filter size& Front/Back Lens Caps. I wasn't perhaps as clear as I meant to be. This is also a Vivitar Series 1 10th anniversary edition. Vivitar 636 AF TTL Dedicated Flash Auto Focus Illuminator with Vivitar 20mm Panel Diffuser and Manual. ![]() The older version F2.8-4 is really good, probably the best out ofīut be aware that there is a much newer version F2.8-4 Vivitar 1 product rating - Vivitar AF 70-210mm f. Though so can take a bit of getting used to Vivitar Series 1 Lens Macro Focusing Zoom 70-210mm 1:2.8-4.0 VMC 58mm Pentax K. The 2.8-4 70-210 is a very good lens and is the best of the Of quality and will advertise them as such even when they're Vivitar AF Series 1 70-210 mm f/ 2.8-4 Apochromatic (Cosina) Lens mounts: Nikon F (FX, DX) 4.2 0 0 Posted by: SharkDD Add to compare list Sigma APO 70-210 mm f/ 2.8 Lens mounts: Nikon F (FX, DX) 4. ![]() Youĭo have to be careful tough as many believe all S1s are that sort There are some nice lenses with great optics and build quality. S1 lenses were designed to be a high class option from Vivitar and Recent AF ones, not so ading on past glory. Old manal Series 1s tend to be good, more modern ones and the
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |